SWIFT CSP & CSCF ASSESSMENT
SWIFT Security Assessment
Framework
Independent security assessment of your SWIFT infrastructure aligned to CSCF v2026 — covering secure zones, access controls, transaction integrity, and CSP attestation readiness across all architecture types.
Comprehensive independent assessment of your SWIFT environment aligned to the latest CSCF framework — helping your institution strengthen its security posture, meet annual attestation requirements, and build long-term resilience across your messaging infrastructure.
01
ENVIRONMENT DESIGN
Secure Architecture Review
Validate your SWIFT secure zone isolation, architecture classification, and network boundary controls.
Architecture type validation — confirm correct classification and re-classification needs under v2026
Zone segmentation — boundary controls, network isolation, and lateral movement paths
Cloud & virtualisation — hypervisor hardening, tenant separation, and hosted components
Connector mapping — customer connectors, middleware, and file transfer clients in scope
Let's Start →
ARCHITECTURE COVERAGE
On-Premise Full-Stack Deployments
A1 / A2
Connector & Middleware Environments
A3 / A4
Service Bureau & Provider-Managed
Type B
Cloud-Hosted & Hybrid Models
All Types
SECURE ZONE
SEGMENTATION
CLOUD
CONNECTORS
02
IDENTITY & ACCESS
Access Governance & Credential Protection
Assess identity governance, privilege segregation, and credential protection across the SWIFT ecosystem.
Authentication coverage — MFA enforcement and token lifecycle across all access paths
Privilege governance — segregation of duties, four-eyes enforcement, and role separation
Credential protection — vault configuration, rotation policies, and exposure in logs or scripts
Privileged accounts — admin and service account controls across secure zone hosts
Let's Start →
ACCESS REVIEW AREAS
Multi-Factor Authentication Coverage
Segregation of Duties & Four-Eyes
Token & Certificate Lifecycle
Privileged Account Governance
Credential Storage & Rotation
Personnel Vetting & Onboarding
MFA
RBAC
GOVERNANCE
CREDENTIALS
03
CYBER RESILIENCE
Platform Hardening & Vulnerability Assessment
Review security configuration, patch posture, and attack surface across your SWIFT infrastructure.
Configuration baselines — benchmark against industry hardening standards
Patch & lifecycle posture — update cadence, end-of-life exposure, and vendor applicability
Vulnerability discovery — targeted scanning within the secure zone with prioritised remediation
Application security — Alliance platform configuration, session security, and encryption
Let's Start →
HARDENING FOCUS AREAS
Alliance Platform Configuration
Operator Workstation Security
Patch Currency & EOL Exposure
Encryption & Session Integrity
Vulnerability Discovery & Triage
HARDENING
ALLIANCE
VULNERABILITY
PATCHING
04
MESSAGING & TRANSACTIONS
Transaction Integrity & Data Flow Assurance
Assess messaging flow security, back-office integrations, and transaction controls including v2026 mandatory changes.
Message flow protection — encryption and integrity of SWIFT traffic within the secure zone
Back-office integration — bridging servers and legacy flows against v2026 mandatory requirements
Transaction controls — authorisation limits, anomaly detection, and approval workflows
Third-party risk — service bureau governance and correspondent banking relationships
Let's Start →
V2026 READINESS IMPACT
Back-Office Data Flow — Now Mandatory
v2026
Customer Connectors — Expanded Scope
v2026
SD-WAN & Alliance Connect Transition
2026-28
Legacy Integration Remediation
2028
MESSAGING
BACK-OFFICE
SD-WAN
THIRD-PARTY
05
THREAT READINESS
Threat Detection & Incident Response
Evaluate monitoring maturity, response readiness, and threat intelligence integration across the SWIFT environment.
Monitoring & detection — logging coverage, SIEM integration, and anomaly detection
Integrity assurance — application, database, and transaction record integrity
Incident response — SWIFT-specific playbooks, escalation, and tabletop exercises
Security awareness — operator training and organisational readiness
Let's Start →
DETECTION & RESPONSE MATURITY
Monitoring & Log Analytics
Detect
Application & Data Integrity
Protect
Incident Response & Escalation
Respond
Threat Intelligence & ISAC Integration
Inform
Security Awareness & Training
Enable
MONITORING
INTEGRITY
INCIDENT RESPONSE
AWARENESS
06
COMPLIANCE & ATTESTATION
CSP Attestation & Gap Remediation
End-to-end support for your annual CSP independent assessment and KYC-SA attestation.
Gap analysis — benchmark current posture against the latest CSCF framework
Classification advisory — validate deployment type and re-classification needs
Evidence & assessor readiness — evidence packages, dry runs, and assessor liaison
Remediation roadmap — phased plan for identified gaps and upcoming framework changes
Let's Start →
ENGAGEMENT APPROACH
1
Scoping & Architecture Validation
Phase 1
2
Gap Analysis & Risk Prioritisation
Phase 2
3
Remediation & Implementation Support
Phase 3
4
Evidence Preparation & Dry Runs
Phase 4
5
KYC-SA Attestation Submission
Phase 5
CSCF V2026
KYC-SA
GAP ANALYSIS
REMEDIATION
Ready for your SWIFT CSP assessment?
Share your architecture type and environment details — we'll scope an assessment aligned to CSCF v2026.

Our Approach

The SWIFT Security Assurance Service follows our home-grown ADR (Assess, Declare, Respond) assessment model.

Work Process Image

ASSESS: Threat Emulation & Active Penetration testing to validate security controls implemented in the Bank’s SWIFT Ecosystem

During this phase, the SWIFT ecosystem of the financial organization will be assessed from the perspective of a real intruder or an attacker. All the SWIFT scopped assets such as, E-banking channels, Consumer application of SWIFT, Operator Workstations and associated infrastructure will fall within the scope of the assessment. The assessment will be performed in a controlled non-disruptive manner with best efforts for zero annoyance on business operations. The defense capabilities of the blue team security suite and the detection capabilities of Cyber SOC for each of the simulated threat scenarios will be recorded and reported.
N-SAF uses a hybrid approach of passive and active test cases for measuring the effectiveness of logical security controls associated with the SWIFT ecosystem. Evidence in the form of screenshots, configurations files, videos or snapshots, and policy documents will be collected to create an internal evidence repository.

Work Process Image

DECLARE: CSP Gap Assessment in line with SWIFT CSCF

Using an easy-to-understand questionnaire, our team works with the SWIFT workforce within the bank to capture the present posture of the Mandatory and Advisory controls as mandated by CSCF. The resulting Gap assessment report is discussed with the client, and a remediation advisory is provided to mitigate the findings. If necessary additional evidence is collected post-deployment of recommended remediation, before the issuance of the audit Completion Letter, as an approved Assessment Provider.

Work Process Image

RESPOND: C-SOC enablement for SWIFT environment breach detection

NetSentries Cyber Threat Management Team has created proprietary “correlation rule and use case” bundles to monitor attacks against your SWIFT ecosystems. These use cases are continuously reviewed and improved considering the publicly available historical and current SWIFT breaches or incidents, advisories from SWIFT and product vendors. These continuous security monitoring rules are vendor agnostic and can be used to develop correlation rules for any SIEM/SOAR solutions to monitor your SWIFT ecosystem against attacks proactively.